Fonte di grammatica

(Rubato shamelessly-e corretto grammaticale-da un rapporto di Reuters)

Vuvuzela (la tromba di plastica ubiquista sempre presente alla tazza recentemente conclusiva del mondo) è fra 2.000 nuove parole e frasi aggiunte alla terza edizione del Dizionario di inglese de Oxford, pubblicato il giovedì, agosto. 20. Il dizionario è compilato dall'analisi di due miliardo parole usate in tutto dai romanzi ai bordi del messaggio del Internet.

Lo scricchiolio di accreditamento caratterizza pesante nelle aggiunte relative a quest'anno, con i termini come “overleveraged,„ intraprendendo troppo debito e “facilitare quantitativo,„ l'introduzione di nuovi soldi dentro alla riserva monetaria dalla banca centrale, fra quelle incluse.

“Staycation,„ una festa spesa nel suo p#se d'origine e “bargainous,„ costando meno usuale, inoltre riflette il soggetto caldo di cinghia-fissaggio fra i consumatori durante la diminuzione economica.

L'aumento “dei mezzi sociali,„ in se un nuovo termine, ha deposto le uova parecchie aggiunte, compreso “defriend,„ rimuovendo qualcuno da una lista degli amici o dei contatti su un luogo sociale della rete e “il tweetup,„ una riunione organizzata via gli alberini su Twitter. Altre parole includono:

• Bromance: un rapporto vicino ma non-sessuale fra due uomini
• Buzzkill: una persona o una cosa che hanno un effetto deprimente o dispiriting
• Cheeseball: difettare del gusto, dello stile o dell'originalità
• Chillax: calmi giù e distenda
• Frenemy: una persona con quale uno è amichevole malgrado un'avversione o una rivalità fondamentale
• Interweb: il Internet
• Disfunzione del Wardrobe: un caso di una persona che espone casualmente una parte intima del loro corpo come risultato di un articolo di scivolare fuori dei vestiti della posizione.

Se il blogosphere e “i giornalisti del cittadino„ in linea granulosi già non avessero esposto la penuria e la morte di giornalismo tradizionale (e di relativa manipolazione crass di realtà), allora denominata speciale di ESPN della notte scorsa, se ricordo correttamente, “la decisione,„ certamente ha messo il chiodo finale nella bara.

Sto riferendomi, naturalmente, a quel overblown, insultante downright la TV di un'ora speciale sulla decisione di LeBron James della stella di pallacanestro su dove giocare la stagione prossima.

Non solo la denunzia egli stesso del James come hallow, poco profondo, incapace--non pensano grande niente, ma il Gray del Jim del interlocutor ha cementato il suo posto nella storia journalistic come forse l'etici più grandi ed il professionali vendono-fuori (ho desiderato usare la parola “di W„, in modo da vada avanti e riempa le quattro lettere finali di quella parola) di tutto il tempo.

If I were still in journalism school (thankfully, that was decades ago), I'd drop out and pursue a more honorable career in, say, propaganda, er, public relations. At least in that profession you're expected to pimp for others and get paid for it.

The most celebrated novel of the 20th century, Ulysses, and its author, James Joyce, are celebrated each June 16 on what's called "Bloomsday."

The "Bloom" part comes from the central character in Ulysses, who was named Leopold Bloom, and the date from the day in which the novel's 24-hour narration takes place, June 16, 1904.

Bloomsday is celebrated widely in Dublin, setting of the novel, and truly in spots around the world wherever there are fans of Joyce and his writings.

The Dublin festivities include pub crawls, which tend to incline me toward celebrating the occasion in that Irish city.

Maybe I can make it there in 2011.

Turns out our neighbors to the north have quite a (sarcastic) sense of humor about them.

You have to read the article and then at least the first ten comments to get the true joy out of this reading experience (read Rhino especially):

BEWARE THE KILLER HOT DOGS

Who will save us?

Who will save book publishing?

What will save the newspapers?

What means 'save'?

If by save you mean, "what will keep things just as they are?" then the answer is nothing will. It's over.

If by save you mean, "who will keep the jobs of the pressmen and the delivery guys and the squadrons of accountants and box makers and transshippers and bookstore buyers and assistant editors and coffee boys," then the answer is still nothing will. Not the Kindle, not the iPad, not an act of Congress.

We need to get past this idea of saving, because the status quo is leaving the building, and quickly. Not just in print of course, but in your industry too.

If you want to know who will save the joy of reading something funny, or the leverage of acting on fresh news or the importance of allowing yourself to be changed by something in a book, then don't worry. It doesn't need saving. In fact, this is the moment when we can figure out how to increase those benefits by a factor of ten, precisely because we don't have to spend a lot of resources on the saving part.

Every revolution destroys the average middle first and most savagely.

Stolen shamelessly without permission from Seth Godin's Blog. Read this and mull it over many times and prepare for the future.

Actually, I don't have ten, but it's a nice number to project authority on a subject matter, which is why using lists and touting them in a blog post's title helps make the thing go viral. I guess people cannot digest paragraphs, or good ol' expository writing or–heaven help us!–essays anymore. They need lists, so they can have etch little compartments in their tiny little brains and also have food for fodder when trying to sound authoritative on a subject: "Yeah, there are three good reasons why…blah, blah, blah."

So my main (numbers one through ten) reason for generally shunning lists is this–you can't develop a logical argument or a good piece of exposition by hanging it all on lists. Oh, sure, you can squeeze in a list in lots of written pieces, but I'd say for the most part lists are mere shameless expositions of laziness (when it comes to writing) and hasty ploys to go viral for an audience that disdains having to read and be led to a logical conclusion.

When I read the following article on "blogging like the British," I kept trying to figure ways I could use lists on my restaurant review site, but nothing seemed to really fit the challenge. What am supposed to write, something that goes "the ten reasons I hate Jenny's Slop House are…"?

Anyway, the article has lots of good advice in it, but I would not agree that you have to spell out numbers through 100 (read: one hundred). I start using digits at 10, and that's a good enough artifice (most books might say to use digits after ten) for everyday writing.

Earlier, the Oxford Dictionary named unfriend the Word of the Year, and now the American Dialect Society has proclaimed google (lower case for Web searches) as the Word of the Decade.

Bing, the Microsoft search engine, has chimed in by announcing that Twitter was the most popular word of 2009.

What does all this mean? That we spend too much time on the Net, and we should remind ourselves to get a life in 2010.

Google that, will ya?

I guess it’s best to start with the positive (no plural). At least disgraced baseball slugger Mark McGwire had the courage to own up to his steroid abuse–partially anyway.

In admitting yesterday that he had used steroids (whose names he conveniently couldn’t remember), McGwire fell back on what has now become the number-one cop-out defense of their use. He used them for medicinal purposes.

He was okay up until that point, had he just gone on and said he didn’t realize he’d get hooked when he saw what they did for his performance on the field. Instead, during an hourlong interview with Bob Costas, he repeatedly denied that using steroids gave him any performance boost. He instead thanked "The Man Up Above" for his power to whack 70 home runs at an age (34) when most baseball players are fading fast.

Those who have been exposed as steroid users have now fallen on three standard defenses: complete and utter denial (Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds), "I didn’t know I was taking them because they were in a vitamin a teammate gave me" (Rafael Palmiero), and medicinal use (McGwire, Andy Pettitte).

Another approach is MLB-sanctioned and team-complicit silence (Manny Ramirez), but one should expect nothing less from a sleazeball organization like the L.A. Dodgers.

Anyway, call McGwire’s defense "The Super Acetaminophine Explanation": Using steroids in "low doses" healed my body without giving me any additional strength or endurance, so it was all okay.

Then if it were all okay, why the hell did you break down and cry on TV and make the rounds of apologizing to everyone, including the Roger Maris family? Remember, Mark, they were just pain killers and body healers, not performance enhancers. No need to apologize for that, now is there?

College and universities have long required applicants to write essays to evaluate their ability to reason and use the English language effectively.

However, what on earth would answers to any of these questions ever reveal on the reasoning side:

How do you feel about Wednesday? (University of Chicago, 2002)

Are we alone? (Tufts, 2009)

Make a bold prediction about something in the year 2010 that no one else has made a bold prediction about. (University of Virginia, 1999)

More silly essay topics here.