修辭

由傑夫・ StatsA� 

根據多數字典，修辭是使用語言和指揮語言技能藝術在口頭或書面聯絡。 很好被瞭解，人必須有效地溝通考慮到listener†™s背景和能力察覺。

因為語言有成為的一個人類的最重要的發明，學習修辭是開發通信能力。 通信能力，人們互相通過知識。

然而，觀眾決定保留或拒绝修辭學者設法通過的知識。

€使用€它解釋一種關鍵的政治天分令人信服地使用語言的Greeks首先介紹期限â œrhetoric⠝。 修辭理論為超過被開發了2,000年和人仍然有很多疑義什麼是修辭，并且怎樣它運作。

現今，修辭根據現實的構想，人類本性和語言。要做它comprehendible修辭是一個封閉系統定義什麼能，并且不能，被知道; knower的本質; 關係的本質knower，知道和觀眾之間的; 并且語言的本質。

修辭在所有社會企圖最後因而被牽連。 它在文化的活動的中心。 現在，看一個特殊社會的rhetorics我們可以瞭解誰是我們談話與，并且怎樣應該我們談話使它容易明白我們。

我提及了前面，修辭有許多理論到它，然而，最重大部分是交易上的理論。 什麼他們基本上說是互作用和瞭解來自知識在rhethor和觀眾之間。 它必要不必須是口頭講話。 書面來源使用修辭也被開發。 因此，修辭在知識和獲取這知識基地。

傳統上，修辭被觀看了作為說服藝術。 然而，一些增加修辭想法如認識。 假定修辭作為說服到真相是有毛病的。 柏拉圖認為，如果有真相，并且它可以由一些瞭解，什麼是修辭的目的？ 想法提議如「動態精華」。 這精華將知道真相并且解釋它對大量。 Idea of rhetoric-as-epistemic requires individual participation in knowing.

Knowledge is dependent on the experiences of the community. The very part of knowing is being committed to what one knows. The commitment is created as knowledge. Truth is the knowledge in a temporal sense. This argument is used to bring the audience and speaker to an even level.

The speaker and the audience unlock themselves to each other and using a trade of opinions along with the understanding that is dissimilar from their starting point. Rhetoric is viewed as a power that creates the truth and at the same time relies on the truths that come with the sense of beginning.

There is not the slightest possibility that people can communicate without sharing knowledge and the other way around, share knowledge without communication. When we talk, write, wave to somebody, we pass some information to responders without even thinking about it. However, the knowledge is not quite identical for everyone.

That is where the major complexity in observing rhetoric as epistemic comes from. Different groups of people use different symbols that mean different things. It is when the second part of episteme (the first is knowledge), understanding, is mandatory. When two groups of people have understood each other, only then they can share knowledge.

The purpose of rhetoric will live as long as communication itself. Although, there is still a great number of discussions that are going on about rhetoric as epistemic; and it will be that way as long as people would be able to use their communicative and analytical skills.

Jeff Stats is a staff writer for custom essay writing service http://www.mindrelief.net