26. Juni 2009
Ich war kein zu spät und auf getragener Zweifel ein Jahrhundert der falschen Seite des Teichs. Ich wurde' das ve, das in der 19. Jahrhundert Italien-Ausgabe meine Abende an den Verdi Opern vollkommen gewesen wurde.
Daß seiend besagt, Sie feststellen müssen, daß ich nahe bei nichts über die Musik von Michael Jackson-gerade die lurid Schlagzeilen kenne.
Jedoch stolperte ich auf eine Seite von Preisangabe heute vom König des Knalls und von mir wurde beeindruckt.
Zwei wirklich angeschlagen mir:
Wenn Sie diese Welt wissend betreten, daß Sie liebten sind und Sie lassen diese Welt das selbe, dann alles wissend, das kann in-between behandelt werden geschieht.
Die Bedeutung des Lebens wird in jedem einzelnen Ausdruck des Lebens enthalten. Es ist in der Unbegrenztheit der Formen und der Phänomene anwesend, die in den ganzen Kreation bestehen.
![[Pfosten zu Twitter]](http://grammarsource.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png)
Tweet dieser Pfosten
Email dieser Pfosten
Drucken Sie diesen Pfosten
Sie konnten auch mögen:
25. Juni 2009
Betrachten Sie dieses von Michael Masnick bei TechDirt:
Wenn das gegenwärtige US Urheberrechtsgesetz in Kraft überShakespeare gewesen war, denke ich, daß er von vielen Autoren für Urheberrechtsverletzung für Schreiben geklagt worden sein könnte, das Meisterwerk.
Zählen Sie, wieviele Prozesse dort für König Lear gerecht gewesen sein konnten alleine:
Spiel Shakespeares basiert auf verschiedenen Konten der halb-legendären keltischen mythologischen Abbildung Lear/Lir.
Shakespeares wichtigste Quelle wird gedacht, um die zweite Ausgabe der Chroniken von England, von Scotlande und von Irelande zu sein von Raphael Holinshed, veröffentlicht 1587. Holinshed himself found the story in the earlier Historia Regum Britanniae by Geoffrey of Monmouth, which was written in the 12th century. Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene, published 1590, also contains a character named Cordelia, who also dies from hanging, as in King Lear.
Other possible sources are A Mirror for Magistrates (1574), by John Higgins; The Malcontent (1604), by John Marston; The London Prodigal (1605); Arcadia (1580-1590), by Sir Philip Sidney, from which Shakespeare took the main outline of the Gloucester subplot; Montaigne’s Essays, which were translated into English by John Florio in 1603; An Historical Description of Iland of Britaine, by William Harrison; Remaines Concerning Britaine, by William Camden (1606); Albion’s England, by William Warner, (1589); and A Declaration of egregious Popish Impostures, by Samuel Harsnett (1603), which provided some of the language used by Edgar while he feigns madness. King Lear is also a literary variant of a common fairy tale, in which a father rejects his youngest daughter for a statement of her love that does not please him.
The source of the subplot involving Gloucester, Edgar, and Edmund is a tale in Philip Sidney’s Countess of Pembroke’s Arcadia, with a blind Paphlagonian king and his two sons, Leonatus and Plexitrus.
Tweet This Post
Email This Post
Print This Post
You Might Also Like:
June 23, 2009
I stumbled across a real, live proofreader today writing about her profession for an online publication called MedPage Today. Not only was it refreshing to read about someone’s plying an honorable but almost extinct journalistic trade, but Liz O’Brien also had two great links. (I wonder if Ms. O’Brien would catch what’s seriously wrong with my previous sentence.)
First, she linked to a story about a proofreader who died at his desk and wasn’t discovered for five days. His legendary name is George Turklebaum, and you can read about him here.
What’s even better is a collection of un- or mis-proofread headlines that are worth more than a few chuckles.
Tweet This Post
Email This Post
Print This Post
You Might Also Like:
June 22, 2009
A lot of what’s causing heartache for newspaper finances across the land is flying under the radar. Most pundits point to the availability of news online, which is all very good as one contributing factor, and others chart the migration of ads from print to online–or to oblivion in these trying times.
However, as both the Minneapolis Star Tribune and Cleveland Plain Dealer announced restructurings over the weekend (the Star Tribune through bankruptcy), the bedrock of newspapers’ financial survival has been gobbled up by Craigslist and other free online advertising venues.
That would be the least flashiest aspect of the business–newspaper classified ads.
So, while newspaper readership is marginally down, classified advertising is hemhorraging. Analyze it as you may, but the bottom line is that newspapers are an endangered species, at least the big-city variety.
Which is all too sad.
Tweet This Post
Email This Post
Print This Post
You Might Also Like:
June 18, 2009
Jonathan Littman and Marc Hershon have come out with a new book, and a Web site of the same name, called I Hate People.
What it reveals–and what took me almost my entire professional career to figure out–is that you can’t trust anyone at work. They’ll all stab you in the back or throw you under the bus in an instant–if it somehow helps them.
Now, back to my headline. I could examine the saying, "There’s strength in numbers," from a perspective of where it came from and what it means, but I’d rather cue it into the book, I Hate People.
The authors reveal that forty or so years ago, Fortune magazine did a survey of qualities employers most sought in employees. Teamwork ranked tenth. In a similar survey done by the magazine in 2005, teamwork had jumped to number one.
How depressing, considering that the only people who love teams are those who command their appearance and those blowhards who worm their way into taking charge of them to feed their egos.
Hershon and Littman cite an experiment by a French engineer named Maximilien Ringelmann, who measured people’s efforts pulling on a rope attached to a strain gauge. Pulling in groups, people exerted themselves less; pulling alone, they gave it their all.
This has come to be known as "social loafing," or simply the "Ringelmann Effect."
Either way, it accounts for the futility of throwing teams at a problem. Better to give a million monkeys one typewriter each and see how long it takes them to recreate the Great Books of the Western World.
Tweet This Post
Email This Post
Print This Post
You Might Also Like:
