<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for Grammar Source</title> <atom:link href="http://grammarsource.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://grammarsource.com</link> <description>Bring your curiosity and questions about English and let&#039;s find answers</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Comment on Comprised v. Is Comprised Of by Eehlex</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2007/03/26/comprised-v-is-comprised-of/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link> <dc:creator>Eehlex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:37:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsucks.com/comprised-v-is-comprised-of.htm#comment-416</guid> <description>Agreed, Mr Mackenzie - I was hoping I wasn&#039;t the only one to &#039;feel&#039; that particular distinction between the two sentences. Are we right, though? How much does it matter when most of the population can&#039;t seem to distinguish between &#039;it&#039;s&#039; and &#039;its&#039;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Mr Mackenzie &#8211; I was hoping I wasn&#8217;t the only one to &#8216;feel&#8217; that particular distinction between the two sentences. Are we right, though? How much does it matter when most of the population can&#8217;t seem to distinguish between &#8216;it&#8217;s&#8217; and &#8216;its&#8217;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Comprised v. Is Comprised Of by Peter</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2007/03/26/comprised-v-is-comprised-of/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:11:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsucks.com/comprised-v-is-comprised-of.htm#comment-414</guid> <description>With respect to is it &quot;comprised&quot; or &quot;comprised of&quot; there is also the matter of tense. I would like to know whether it is correct to say &quot;The old fleet comprised of 27 ships&quot; or &quot;The old fleet comprised 27 ships&quot; or &quot;The old fleet was comprised of 27 ships&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to is it &#8220;comprised&#8221; or &#8220;comprised of&#8221; there is also the matter of tense. I would like to know whether it is correct to say &#8220;The old fleet comprised of 27 ships&#8221; or &#8220;The old fleet comprised 27 ships&#8221; or &#8220;The old fleet was comprised of 27 ships&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Jawaharlal Nehru Shows the Fruits of Classical Education by Alex Aucter</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2009/04/19/jawaharlal-nehru-shows-the-fruits-of-classical-education/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link> <dc:creator>Alex Aucter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:17:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsource.com/?p=447#comment-413</guid> <description>It&#039;s a pity you don&#039;t have a donate button! I&#039;d definitely donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i&#039;ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group. Chat soon!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pity you don&#8217;t have a donate button! I&#8217;d definitely donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i&#8217;ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group. Chat soon!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on ChingLish: More Strange Uses of English in the Far East by Jodie</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2009/08/28/chinglish-more-strange-uses-of-english-in-the-far-east/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link> <dc:creator>Jodie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:44:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsource.com/?p=513#comment-412</guid> <description>This particular example is one of my main reasons why I think Chinglish should be left alone, wherever possible. What&#039;s nicer, this or &quot;Keep off the grass&quot;? I know which one I&#039;d pay more attention to. Besides, Chinglish shows that someone is trying. I wouldn&#039;t even know where to start on translation something into Mandarin.Of course, you can&#039;t have that kind of thing cropping up in business documents or anything like that but you&#039;d hope a professional &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rosettatranslation.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;translation agency&lt;/a&gt; was being used anyway!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular example is one of my main reasons why I think Chinglish should be left alone, wherever possible. What&#8217;s nicer, this or &#8220;Keep off the grass&#8221;? I know which one I&#8217;d pay more attention to. Besides, Chinglish shows that someone is trying. I wouldn&#8217;t even know where to start on translation something into Mandarin.</p><p>Of course, you can&#8217;t have that kind of thing cropping up in business documents or anything like that but you&#8217;d hope a professional <a
href="http://www.rosettatranslation.com/" rel="nofollow">translation agency</a> was being used anyway!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on NotWords: Now Days by nat</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2007/07/19/notwords-now-days/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link> <dc:creator>nat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:15:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsucks.com/notwords-now-days.htm#comment-410</guid> <description>I am an Australian and I say nowdays, without the a. It is completely normal. Both forms are correct. There are lots of varieties of english, it is an old language and has gone in many directions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an Australian and I say nowdays, without the a. It is completely normal. Both forms are correct. There are lots of varieties of english, it is an old language and has gone in many directions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Comprised v. Is Comprised Of by Duh ness</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2007/03/26/comprised-v-is-comprised-of/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link> <dc:creator>Duh ness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:14:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsucks.com/comprised-v-is-comprised-of.htm#comment-405</guid> <description>&quot;is comprised of&quot; has found its way into popular usage for the same reason that &quot;between you and I&quot; has: people wanting (and failing) to sound intelligent. So this is &quot;between you and me&quot;: if you are trying to sound intelligent, just say that your stupid damn whole &quot;consists of&quot; your stupid dumb parts or let the whole actively &quot;comprise&quot; the parts, no matter what your stupid dictionaries or fake news anchors say. If you are not trying to sound intelligent, why even stick your neck out for &quot;comprise&quot; in the first place? Just say &quot;is made up of&quot; or &quot;is composed of&quot; or whatever. Simple logic, people: Know your place.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;is comprised of&#8221; has found its way into popular usage for the same reason that &#8220;between you and I&#8221; has: people wanting (and failing) to sound intelligent. So this is &#8220;between you and me&#8221;: if you are trying to sound intelligent, just say that your stupid damn whole &#8220;consists of&#8221; your stupid dumb parts or let the whole actively &#8220;comprise&#8221; the parts, no matter what your stupid dictionaries or fake news anchors say. If you are not trying to sound intelligent, why even stick your neck out for &#8220;comprise&#8221; in the first place? Just say &#8220;is made up of&#8221; or &#8220;is composed of&#8221; or whatever. Simple logic, people: Know your place.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Comprised v. Is Comprised Of by Gareth</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2007/03/26/comprised-v-is-comprised-of/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link> <dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:49:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsucks.com/comprised-v-is-comprised-of.htm#comment-404</guid> <description>What&#039;s interesting about Jack and Grammarblogger is that regardless of whether they&#039;re right or wrong - and I believe they are mistaken in this - their logic is overtly flawed.
They agreed that &quot;The city’s population is comprised of Asians and Europeans.
and
The city’s population comprises Asians and Europeans.&quot; had the same meaning whereas they had failed to swap Subject and Object.
Man bites dog cannot be the same as Man is bitten by dog.
In any case, you wouldn&#039;t say anything was included of, would you..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s interesting about Jack and Grammarblogger is that regardless of whether they&#8217;re right or wrong &#8211; and I believe they are mistaken in this &#8211; their logic is overtly flawed.<br
/> They agreed that &#8220;The city’s population is comprised of Asians and Europeans.<br
/> and<br
/> The city’s population comprises Asians and Europeans.&#8221; had the same meaning whereas they had failed to swap Subject and Object.<br
/> Man bites dog cannot be the same as Man is bitten by dog.<br
/> In any case, you wouldn&#8217;t say anything was included of, would you..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Quotes from the King of Pop Show Some Soul by Breakfast Nook&#160;</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2009/06/26/quotes-from-the-king-of-pop-show-some-soul/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link> <dc:creator>Breakfast Nook&#160;</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 06:42:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsource.com/?p=483#comment-403</guid> <description>oh im just so sad that the King of Pop is already dead.:,</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh im just so sad that the King of Pop is already dead.:,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Quotes from the King of Pop Show Some Soul by Finlay Richardson</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2009/06/26/quotes-from-the-king-of-pop-show-some-soul/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link> <dc:creator>Finlay Richardson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsource.com/?p=483#comment-400</guid> <description>sadly, the King of Pop will never be coming back again, oh i missed Michale Jackson`-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sadly, the King of Pop will never be coming back again, oh i missed Michale Jackson`-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Mark Cuban Definitely Knows Business, But Not Grammar by Arianna Torres</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2009/02/13/mark-cuban-definitely-knows-business-but-not-grammar/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link> <dc:creator>Arianna Torres</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:06:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsource.com/?p=401#comment-397</guid> <description>it is quite hard to think of a great business idea that would earn you lots of money in a short period of time;:`</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is quite hard to think of a great business idea that would earn you lots of money in a short period of time;:`</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/27 queries in 0.330 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: grammarsource.com @ 2012-05-24 22:43:24 -->
