Canada, which this year purged its national anthem to make it gender-less, is now leading the charge toward political correctness.
You may have seen the video in which Prime Minister Justin Trudeau corrects a young woman who uses the word “mankind” and advises her to use “peoplekind” instead “’cause it’s more inclusive.”
The woman — and the audience — agreed with smiles and cheers.
When his own nation turned on him for the comment, a week later Trudeau said it was all “a dumb joke.”
“Dumb” I agree with, and “joke” seems to apply to the office of the current prime minister of Canada.
Happy Holidays” is a pretty simple grammatical construction, as are “Merry Christmas,” “Happy Hanukkah,” “Happy New Year” and various other celebratory sayings. But we use “Many Happy Returns” without, at least in my case, understanding what it means.
I’m a weirdo who’s lived way too long for my meager abilities and accomplishments, but my 39th birthday (being celebrating for something like the 39th time) arrives this Sunday, on Christmas Eve. Now I follow astrology, numerology, Buddhism, Friedrich Nietzsche, the Akashic Records, The Lotus Sutra and Tao te Ching (The Way) as guides to my life and basically the meaning of existence.
So today when my birthday numerology report arrived, I was pleased to learn what “Many Happy Returns” means. As it turns out, on each of our birthdays, the sun returns to the exact position it was in when we were born. Thus “Many Happy Returns” — may the sun bless you for many times in the future.
There you go. Who woulda thunk it?
PS Can anyone explained why do’s has an apostrophe before the s but don’ts doesn’t?
It wouldn’t be my choice, but a poll by Marist College determined that “whatever” is the most annoying word in the American lexicon for the ninth straight year.
The poll was conducted Nov. 6-9 of 1,074 adults with an error factor of 3 percent.
Now, if I were asked to pick the most annoying (and meaningless) word in use by most Americans, I’d say it’s “awesome.” The use of “awesome” appears to be a substitute for people who can’t formulate a sentence around what they really feel.
“How was the movie?” “Awesome.”
“How was dinner?” “Awesome.”
“How was your death?” “Awesome.”
Anyway, you get the idea.
The rest of the list of the top five, in order, consists of “fake news,” “no offense,” “literally,” and “you know what I mean.”
Now, that’s an awesome list, you know?
No heads turn when someone says, “Everyone is bringing their own lunch.”
Except … it should be, grammatically speaking, “Everyone is bringing his own lunch.”
This brings up the whole question of our ubiquitous use of they and their as singular pronouns and possessives. As I noted, no heads turn when people use the plural to modify a singular antecedent.
I mention this after reading an interesting article in the New York Times, “Toppling the Grammar Patriarchy,” which describes French teachers’ rebellion over defaulting to masculine forms even when the subject includes both male and female.
Here’s an example by author Carmel McCoubrey: [“I]f you wrote a sentence about attractive (beaux) étudiants and attractive (belles) étudiantes, the adjective used to describe them had to be masculine, too: “Les étudiants et les étudiantes sont beaux.”
Continue reading “Is It Ever Okay to Use ‘They’ as a Singular Pronoun?”
Some of these grammar jokes, courtesy of Reader’s Digest, are actually fairly funny:
20 JOKES EVERY GRAMMAR NERD WILL APPRECIATE
This was way back in the Pleistocene when I was in high school, but I remember to this day arguing with an English teacher over the pronunciation of the word clique. I said click; he said cleek.
There was no Internet back then. In fact, electricity itself was pretty new, so we grabbed our classroom dictionary (probably Webster’s, but who knows?), and sure enough, cleek was the only choice for pronunciation. I had lost our gentlemen’s bet.
My, how the times have changed. I just checked dictionary dot com and the pronunciations (now two) were given in this order: kleek, then klick.
Okay, so my “fake news” post bombed. Let’s move on to real grammatical issues.
Almost everyone I hear or read uses the phrase “as long as” in the conditional sense, as in, “as long as you don’t care, neither do I.” Wrong!
The phase “as long as” is a comparison of lengths. “That building is as long as three football fields” is one example of correct usage.
“So long as” is a conditional phrase, as in “so long as you don’t care, neither do I.”
Or can you?
A mysterious tweet by Donald Trump — “Despite the negative press covfefe” — went viral for about five-and-a-half hours earlier today, leading to all kinds of humor and speculation on the social media.
I sometimes end up making mysterious words and sentences when I put my cell phone in my pocket while it’s still on. Bodily movements and hand-in-pocket gyrations make for weird words and sentences, but this tweet seemed to start out straight and end with a new word.
Coming soon to a market near you, a new candy bar called Covfefe.
Wanna guess what that three-letter word is before reading about it? Take a few seconds and then go to:
The Most Complicated Word in English???
As I watched one of my favorite TV shows the other night — “Imposters” — one of the characters mentioned that the word weird originally meant destiny.
I thought that was a bit weird and worth researching, and guess what? That was the exact meaning of the Old English word wyrd — fate or destiny.
It seems that Shakespeare started, or accelerated, the modern interpretation (with the help of the Scotch earlier), when he described the witches in Macbeth as weird.
Original usage of wyrd, however, was as a note, as wordorigins.com notes:
Weird is found in Beowulf (spelled wyrd) as a noun meaning fate or destiny:
Gæð a wyrd swa hio scel.
(Fate goes ever as fate must.)
Hie wyrd forsweop on Grendles gryre.
(Fate sweeps them away into Grendel’s clutches.)