<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Seriouse Lacke of Judgement</title> <atom:link href="http://grammarsource.com/2008/06/30/a-seriouse-lacke-of-judgement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://grammarsource.com/2008/06/30/a-seriouse-lacke-of-judgement/</link> <description>Bring your curiosity and questions about English and let&#039;s find answers</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:37:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: grammarblogger</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2008/06/30/a-seriouse-lacke-of-judgement/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link> <dc:creator>grammarblogger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:34:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsucks.com/?p=291#comment-305</guid> <description>Yese.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yese.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Verbivore</title><link>http://grammarsource.com/2008/06/30/a-seriouse-lacke-of-judgement/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link> <dc:creator>Verbivore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:11:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://grammarsucks.com/?p=291#comment-304</guid> <description>G&#039;day, Grammarblogger.I find your assertion, in &quot;A Seriouse Lacke of Judgement&quot; (30 June 2008), that &quot;judgment is the only spelling&quot; somewhat US-centric and overstated.That may be okay within the confines of US English, but your site nowhere (immediately obvious) declares its national linguistic flavour.The US is not the only English-language nation on Earth, and US standards and styles are far from universal (despite the culturo-linguistic imperialism inherent in the spread of Microsoft Word and the like).You claim to have done &quot;a little dictionary research to see if judgement, the misspelling, has gained acceptability&quot;.Your research must indeed have been confined to a little dictionary. Here are some other dictionaries&#039; pronouncements on the word&#039;s spelling/s:* Merriam-Webster&#039;s Collegiate (10th edn): judgment or judgement (with no commentary on the difference);* Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (5th edn): judgement (also judgment - the usual form in legal use);* Oxford English Reference Dictionary (2nd edn, rev.): judgement (also judgment);* Chambers Dictionary (new 9th edn): judgement or judgment;* Macquarie Australian National Dictionary (rev. 3rd edn): judgment or judgement;* Macquarie International English Dictionary (rev. 3rd edn): judgment or judgement;* Collins English Dictionary (7th edn): judgment or judgement;* Collins Australian Dictionary (5th edn): judgment or judgement.The &quot;e&quot; spelling is standard British English and is also standard in most former British colonies - the main exceptions being the US and Australia (in the latter either spelling being accepted, though the &quot;e-less&quot; version is now in the ascendant).Do you still maintain your assertion that judgement is a misspelling?If so, then I shall have to insist that &quot;center&quot; is also a misspelling.Happy 4 July! (Irrelevant to us Aussies.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day, Grammarblogger.</p><p>I find your assertion, in &#8220;A Seriouse Lacke of Judgement&#8221; (30 June 2008), that &#8220;judgment is the only spelling&#8221; somewhat US-centric and overstated.</p><p>That may be okay within the confines of US English, but your site nowhere (immediately obvious) declares its national linguistic flavour.</p><p>The US is not the only English-language nation on Earth, and US standards and styles are far from universal (despite the culturo-linguistic imperialism inherent in the spread of Microsoft Word and the like).</p><p>You claim to have done &#8220;a little dictionary research to see if judgement, the misspelling, has gained acceptability&#8221;.</p><p>Your research must indeed have been confined to a little dictionary. Here are some other dictionaries&#8217; pronouncements on the word&#8217;s spelling/s:</p><p>* Merriam-Webster&#8217;s Collegiate (10th edn): judgment or judgement (with no commentary on the difference);</p><p>* Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (5th edn): judgement (also judgment &#8211; the usual form in legal use);</p><p>* Oxford English Reference Dictionary (2nd edn, rev.): judgement (also judgment);</p><p>* Chambers Dictionary (new 9th edn): judgement or judgment;</p><p>* Macquarie Australian National Dictionary (rev. 3rd edn): judgment or judgement;</p><p>* Macquarie International English Dictionary (rev. 3rd edn): judgment or judgement;</p><p>* Collins English Dictionary (7th edn): judgment or judgement;</p><p>* Collins Australian Dictionary (5th edn): judgment or judgement.</p><p>The &#8220;e&#8221; spelling is standard British English and is also standard in most former British colonies &#8211; the main exceptions being the US and Australia (in the latter either spelling being accepted, though the &#8220;e-less&#8221; version is now in the ascendant).</p><p>Do you still maintain your assertion that judgement is a misspelling?</p><p>If so, then I shall have to insist that &#8220;center&#8221; is also a misspelling.</p><p>Happy 4 July! (Irrelevant to us Aussies.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: grammarsource.com @ 2012-02-12 07:56:35 -->
