語法來源： Englishpedia帶來您的求知慾和您的問題，并且我們推測我們古怪的語言 |
不管天分(並非許多)他在地板上在「跳舞顯示了與星」，和，無論好他參加一次職業籃球行動， [標記]標記古巴人[/tag]能最好宰割英文與我們。
這他在電視今晚使用的NotPhrase，并且一个我有時使用自己： 「一件整體`nother事」。
我不是肯定的怎麼你將改正那。 「整體其他事」一共將似乎是最邏輯和正確用法。 或一共使用「一件不同的事情」 -那裡您去!
我不會驚奇，如果夥計在牛津字典已經未增加`nother，但是他們大概拼寫了它nother。
1個評論 我在我的書在正確英國用法保留用粉筆寫惡習英文為我期望中的最後詞 快餐英語.
在我的英國構成類這個過去星期，我通過坐了(我應該可能說 通過哼？) 不盡的介紹，不用例外，贈送者使用了的地方 那裡 為佔有慾 他們.
一般來說，當地英國用戶在美國有困難時期與佔有慾，經常使用 它是 為 它-和名單繼續。 (線索： 屬有代詞從未應該是容易記住使用撇號。)
我欠這一個對Copyblogger，在copyediting跑一blog; 在他最新發電子郵件，他指出現今人們(或應該我說，像我的學生， 現在幾天)得到所有被混淆在撇號并且使用它形成複數。 他使用了例子的錯誤 男孩的 為 男孩.
然而，我有一個例子離家較近。 每天早晨，當我壓低我的街道時，我看一看見在某人的前面認為的家， 「史密斯的」 (被更改的名字保護有罪)。
現在，即使您在這建築之後投入名詞做它一真實佔有慾，例如史密斯的議院，它更是不正確的，因為 史密斯 不複數。 Smiths 是，正 Joneses 為 瓊斯 . Simple pluralization rules apply, which I’ll broach one day in my Building Blocks series.
For now, I’ll just point out the abuse.
It’s either a large leather suitcase with two compartments, or a combination of two words to form one new word. What is it?
Of course, if you read the title, you’ll surmise that it’s portmanteau.
What you’re reading here is a portmanteau–a combination of Web and log, or blog.
Other notable examples are smog (smoke and fog), motel (motor and hotel) and brunch (breakfast and lunch).
Collectively, these are all portmanteaux.
In tribute to actress [tag]Deborah Kerr[/tag], who passed away yesterday at 86, I offer here a clip of her kiss on the beach with [tag]Burt Lancaster[/tag], arguably the most famous scene in film history, certainly in terms of the sheer number of still photographs showing the kiss (okay, so this has nothing to do with English, but Ms. Kerr was British):
The dictionary definiation of bloviate is "to speak pompously," and if that doesn’t sum up people with causes in America, nothing does. So my guess is that, if you hate Bill O’Reilly, you’re probably a far-left ideologue and/or a bloviator (the two usually go hand in hand).
Sorry.
Main verbs often need helper verbs to complete their meaning, and these helpers are called auxiliary verbs.
For instance, you’re thinking of going out to dinner, so you say to your roommate: "I may go out to dinner tonight and try that new restaurant."
If go is the main verb, what is the auxiliary? Of course, it’s may.
Auxiliary verbs are often arranged into two groups, those that have to be joined to a main verb and those that can either stand alone or help a main verb.
Auxiliary verbs that can also be main verbs: be, being, been; am, is, are, was, were; have, has, had; do, does, did.
Auxiliary verbs that must appear with main verbs: can, could; may, might; shall, should; will, would; must, ought (to).
When you hear sports jock radio and TV hosts using the word quintessential, you have to wonder if the world really understands what’s essential and what’s quintessential?
In short, essential means "indispensable," while quintessential means "the most typical."
I think most people just opt for quintessential because it sounds so fancy-schmancy without stopping to think about what they really mean.
I have no ready examples, but the next time you hear someone use quintessential, ask yourself if that person means "indispensable" or "most typical."
Generally, I hate seeing slang and misused English words suddenly accepted as standard English by the dictionary people (who authorized them anyway?), but a NotWord making its rounds does have several things going for it.
Plutonomy is not in any dictionary, so let’s look at its definition courtesy of the blog One Stop Thought Shop:
In a "[tag]plutonomy[/tag]," according to Citigroup global strategist [tag]Ajay Kapur[/tag], economic growth is powered by and largely consumed by the wealthy few. Canada and Britain fall into that category too, he says, the euro zone and Japan much less so.
There may be some truth to the fact that our society’s economic survival hinges on the consumption and spending habits of the super rich, so coining a word like plutonomy provides a useful shortcut to describe this phenomenon.
Right now, it seems to be a neutral term, descriptive rather than judgmental, but if you hear Hillary and the Democrats start using it, then you’ll know it’s been morphed into a pejorative.
Plutonomy may be safe from the hands of the politicians, however. It’s just too obscure and hard to remember for mass consumption. Instead, the old saw about "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" will no doubt fill the Democrats’ carpetbags until time itself ceases.
They’re rewriting the English language to make it more phonetic. That’s about the only conclusion I, a non-video-gamer, can draw when I come across words like lewt.
Which means?
Loot, of course. Just like it sounds.
For further reference, check the site TenTonHammer.com.
I’m just going to stick to the real basics of English verb tenses in this posting (no need at this time to muddy the waters with complications like perfect tenses and conditional tenses, etc.).
Keeping matters fundamental, let’s say that English has three basic tenses: past, present and future.
We’ll start with the present with the verb to be. Example: "I am in my living room right now typing on my computer." Here, the present tense of the verb be is am because it is singular first person.
Past tense: "Last night I was in my living room watching the baseball playoffs." Here the first person past single form of be is was.
Future tense: "Tomorrow morning I will be in my living room reading the newspaper." Here the future form is will be.
I actually started with one of the more difficult verbs in English because its form changes depending on whether the subject is singular or plural or first (I, we), second (you, you) or third (he, she, it, they) person.
Most regular verbs are much simpler. They become singular by adding an s at the end and become past tense by adding an ed at the end. Future tense is indicated by adding a will before the verb.
Let’s look at the verb walk: I walk, he walks, they walk. I walked, he walked, they walked. I will walk, he will walk, they will walk.
Fairly straightforward, those, but look at one of the many irregular verbs in English, in this case eat: I eat, he eats, they eat. I ate, he ate, they ate. I will eat, he will eat, they will eat. See how the past tense is irregular.
Unfortunately, in English you have to memorize the irregular verbs in all their forms. Here’s a list to get you started.
